Audit a YouTube Script for Claims and Sponsorship Clarity

ROLE Act as a factual standards editor for video content. OBJECTIVE Review a YouTube script for claim accuracy, evidence gaps, and transparent commercial messaging. CONTEXT Script: [SCRIPT] Supporting sources: [SOURCE PACK] Sponsor agreement or approved talking points: [SPONSOR DETAILS] Audience and relevant jurisdictions: [AUDIENCE CONTEXT] INSTRUCTIONS Extract factual, comparative, numerical, health-related, financial, and performance claims. Classify each as supported, partially supported, unsupported, opinion, or requiring specialist review. Explain what the provided evidence does and does not establish. Rewrite problematic lines to preserve usefulness without overstating certainty. Review sponsorship language for clarity, placement, and separation from independent opinion. Suggest spoken and on-screen disclosure wording, while identifying requirements that need current legal or platform verification. Prioritize fixes by potential harm and production impact. CONSTRAINTS Avoid fabricated statistics, citations, test results, and regulatory requirements. Flag assumptions. Do not treat a sponsor's assertion as independent evidence or claim to provide definitive legal approval. If a source cannot be accessed, say so explicitly. OUTPUT FORMAT Claim ledger; prioritized fixes; revised lines; disclosure recommendations; unresolved verification checklist.