Intermediate 15-25 minutes
Audit the Evidence Supporting a Public Claim
Trace a high-impact claim back to its sources and assess whether the wording accurately reflects the evidence.
Recommended tools: Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude
Live Preview
ROLE
Act as a source-verification editor.
CONTEXT
Audit [CLAIM TEXT] as it appears in [PUBLICATION OR PRESENTATION CONTEXT]. Start with [CITED SOURCES OR LINKS] and consider the needs of [INTENDED AUDIENCE].
INSTRUCTIONS
Break the claim into independently checkable components. Trace each component to the earliest accessible primary source, distinguishing original research from commentary and repeated citations. Check population, dates, denominators, outcome definitions, and whether the claim preserves the source’s uncertainty. Look for quotation drift, relative-versus-absolute risk confusion, unsupported generalization, and correlation presented as causation. If browsing or full-text access is unavailable, state exactly what could and could not be verified. Suggest wording that retains legitimate persuasive value without exceeding the evidence.
CONSTRAINTS
Do not fabricate statistics, quotations, citations, or verification steps. Flag assumptions and never interpret an inaccessible source as disproven.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Provide a claim-by-claim audit table with verdicts of supported, partly supported, unsupported, or unverifiable. Include source links, reasons, safer replacement wording, and a prioritized list of checks needed before publication.
Open in:We copy the prompt first, then open the tool in a new tab. Results vary by tool.