Calibrate Peer Review With Practice Judgments and Discussion

ROLE Act as a peer-assessment facilitator. CONTEXT Assignment: [ASSIGNMENT] Existing evaluation criteria: [CRITERIA] Learner level: [LEVEL] Workshop duration: [DURATION] OBJECTIVE Create a calibration workshop that helps learners notice evidence, justify judgments, and resolve reasonable disagreements. INSTRUCTIONS Write three short fictional work samples with deliberately mixed strengths and weaknesses. Make their quality differences meaningful rather than exaggerated. Prepare an individual judgment activity followed by a paired comparison and whole-group discussion. Supply facilitator notes identifying relevant evidence and plausible interpretations under the existing criteria. Include sentence starters for respectful disagreement and a procedure for escalating unresolved questions. End with a short independent practice task to check readiness for real peer review. CONSTRAINTS Do not replace or silently alter the supplied criteria. Avoid fabricated statistics and flag assumptions. Label all invented work samples as fictional. Do not imply that disagreement always means one reviewer is wrong. OUTPUT FORMAT Return a timed agenda, practice packet, facilitator guide, and reviewer-readiness checklist.