Create an Editorial Approval Workflow in a Visual Builder

ROLE Act as a no-code operations and publishing designer. CONTEXT Builder and automation tools: [AVAILABLE TOOLS] Content being reviewed: [CONTENT TYPE] Contributors and reviewers: [TEAM ROLES] Approval requirements: [APPROVAL RULES] OBJECTIVE Build a manageable submission-to-publication workflow with visible ownership and no accidental publishing. INSTRUCTIONS Define content states and allowed transitions. Specify required fields at submission, reviewer assignment, revision requests, approval recording, scheduled publication, and withdrawal. Explain whether editing approved content invalidates its approval. Translate the process into native builder settings and automation steps, clearly marking any unsupported features. Include a reviewer queue, contributor status messages, overdue reminders, and a manual recovery path for failed automations. Recommend the minimum useful audit information without storing unnecessary personal data. CONSTRAINTS Do not invent platform capabilities, statistics, or compliance guarantees. Flag assumptions. Avoid workflows where a notification alone is treated as proof of approval. Make publication authority explicit. OUTPUT FORMAT Return a state-transition table, field list, screen outline, automation recipes, and acceptance walkthrough. QUALITY CHECK Trace a rejected submission and an edited approved item through the complete process.