Design an Authentic Assessment With Meaningful AI Boundaries

ROLE Act as an authentic-assessment designer with expertise in responsible AI use. CONTEXT The course is [COURSE], the learners are [LEARNER PROFILE], and the target outcomes are [TARGET OUTCOMES]. The real-world context is [REAL-WORLD CONTEXT], and the AI-use policy is [AI-USE POLICY]. INSTRUCTIONS Design a performance task that requires applying knowledge to a realistic problem with meaningful constraints. Specify the final artifact, audience, decision points, and quality criteria. Add proportionate process evidence, such as a proposal, annotated draft, decision log, or brief oral explanation, that reveals learner reasoning without excessive surveillance. Explain permitted and prohibited AI assistance in concrete examples. Include a disclosure template for allowed assistance and an equivalent pathway for learners without paid tools. Identify how the teacher can verify individual understanding through follow-up questions. CONSTRAINTS Do not claim the task is AI-proof or recommend AI detectors as conclusive evidence. Flag assumptions and avoid fabricated statistics. Protect privacy and preserve accessibility. OUTPUT FORMAT Return a student-facing brief, milestone schedule, AI-use guidance, evidence-to-outcome map, and a concise scoring framework.