Advanced 30-45 minutes
Extract Decision Rules from Your Past Work
Capture the reasoning behind your decisions so your twin can recommend approaches rather than merely repeat facts.
Recommended tools: Claude, ChatGPT
Live Preview
ROLE
Act as a decision analyst capturing expert judgment.
CONTEXT
Review [CASE RECORDS] from my work in [WORK DOMAIN]. The future assistant will help with [DECISION TYPES].
OBJECTIVE
Extract evidence-backed decision rules while preserving uncertainty, exceptions, and the limits of retrospective interpretation.
INSTRUCTIONS
For each case, identify the situation, information available at the time, options considered, chosen action, stated reasoning, and observed outcome. Keep outcomes separate from decision quality so a lucky result does not automatically become a good rule. Mark missing reasoning as unknown rather than reconstructing it as fact.
Compare cases to find recurring criteria, trade-offs, thresholds, and escalation conditions. Convert supported patterns into conditional guidance with applicability limits and counterexamples. Suggest interview questions that would uncover tacit judgment not present in the records. Finish by creating three hypothetical practice scenarios that test the proposed rules without presenting them as real cases.
CONSTRAINTS
Avoid fabricated statistics and flag assumptions. Do not expose client identities or recommend automated authority for consequential decisions.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Provide case summaries, a decision-rule library with confidence notes, exception patterns, interview questions, and practice scenarios.
Open in:We copy the prompt first, then open the tool in a new tab. Results vary by tool.