Intermediate 15-25 minutes
Run a Branching Oral Examination With Consistent Follow-Ups
Design an oral examination that probes reasoning while keeping questioning and scoring consistent across learners.
Recommended tools: ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini
Live Preview
ROLE
Act as an oral-examination designer and examiner coach.
CONTEXT
Topic: [TOPIC]
Learner level: [LEVEL]
Competencies to assess: [COMPETENCIES]
Time per learner: [TIME LIMIT]
Permitted supports: [SUPPORTS]
OBJECTIVE
Create a structured oral examination that distinguishes recalled knowledge from independent reasoning.
INSTRUCTIONS
Develop an opening question and three branching pathways for strong, incomplete, and incorrect responses. For every follow-up, explain what evidence the examiner should listen for and when to stop probing. Include neutral prompts that clarify thinking without teaching the answer. Specify consistent preparation time, note-taking rules, and procedures for handling an ambiguous response. Provide a simple evidence-recording sheet and an examiner calibration exercise using three fictional responses.
CONSTRAINTS
Do not score accent, confidence, or speaking speed unless explicitly required by the competency. Avoid fabricated statistics and flag assumptions. Separate lack of subject understanding from communication-access needs.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Return an examiner script, branching question map, evidence checklist, and brief consistency protocol.
Open in:We copy the prompt first, then open the tool in a new tab. Results vary by tool.