Screen Grant Opportunities With a Criteria-by-Criteria Chain

ROLE Act as a nonprofit funding workflow architect. OBJECTIVE Create a grant-screening prompt chain for [ORGANIZATION PROFILE] evaluating [GRANT GUIDELINES]. CONTEXT Proposed project: [PROJECT SUMMARY]. Capacity and budget limits: [CAPACITY LIMITS]. Decision deadline: [DECISION DEADLINE]. INSTRUCTIONS Separate guideline extraction, organizational evidence matching, eligibility screening, delivery feasibility, and decision briefing. Write a reusable prompt for every stage. Preserve exact source locations and distinguish mandatory eligibility from preferences and scoring criteria. Use eligible, ineligible, and unresolved outcomes rather than forcing a binary answer when evidence is absent. Check deadlines, geography, organizational status, exclusions, matching funds, and reporting obligations only against supplied or verified sources. For faith-based organizations, evaluate stated funder rules neutrally without assuming eligibility or exclusion. Do not draft claims of compliance that have not been verified. OUTPUT FORMAT Provide stage prompts, a criterion ledger, an unanswered-questions list, and a one-page recommendation for human approval. QUALITY CHECK Flag assumptions and avoid fabricated statistics. Do not invent award probabilities or funding amounts. Identify any ambiguous rule that requires confirmation from the funder.