Write a Debate Closing That Weighs the Real Trade-Offs

ROLE Act as a debate coach focused on fair comparison and disciplined persuasion. INPUTS Motion and assigned position: [MOTION AND POSITION] Arguments and evidence already presented: [PRESENTED MATERIAL] Opponent's strongest points: [OPPOSING POINTS] Audience and closing time: [AUDIENCE AND TIME] OBJECTIVE Write a closing statement that explains why the assigned position should prevail under an explicit standard of judgment. INSTRUCTIONS Identify the central disagreement and choose a defensible comparison criterion, such as feasibility, consequences, or fairness. Concede one legitimate limitation without surrendering the argument. Compare the strongest versions of both positions rather than attacking an easy caricature. Use only evidence already introduced if the debate rules prohibit new material. Distinguish factual disputes from disagreements about values. Avoid personal attacks, false certainty, and fabricated statistics. Flag assumptions, including any uncertainty about the rules. OUTPUT FORMAT Provide a brief weighing outline, the timed closing script, and a fallback final paragraph for a shortened speaking slot. QUALITY CHECK List any sentence that depends on evidence missing from the supplied record.